The rise of the Internet has constituted
a new type of public
sphere that differs from a traditional one. I will demonstrate the benefits
of the Internet
as a public sphere including its advanced participatory culture, abilities
to distribute widespread democratic discussions, and its accessibility. Henry
Jenkins uses his blog, “Confessions of
an Aca-fan,” a form of citizen media, to discuss participatory democracy and
participatory culture. In one of his posts he illustrates that we often think
of democracy in relation to major breakthroughs for citizens such as signing
the Declaration of Independence (Mar 5, 2007). We generally only think of the
Internet as a platform for entertainment, however the benefits of the
Internet and participatory democracy directly affect the public sphere on
an intellectual level. The Internet allows the public to thrive through
enhanced connectivity. In "Publics
and Counterpublics" Michael Warner demonstrates that a pubic can be
self-organized, a relation among strangers, personal and impersonal in terms of
public speech, constituted though mere attention, and it is the social space
created by the reflexive circulation of discourse (413-420). The Internet meets
these criteria however it allows for a public to work on a worldwide scale that
is accessible at any time. Nathaniel Poor refers
to the relationship of the Internet and public spheres as an “online public
sphere” (par. 3). Poor analyses Slashdot and
demonstrates how it establishes itself as a public sphere. Anyone in the world
can use Slashdot at anytime, and yet it is one public sphere. The Internet
provides information to the public in a widespread and overly accessible way
that may not of reached as many citizens if it were just posted in the
newspaper or a book in the library and this leads for a more knowledgeable
democracy in a public sphere. In "Blogging
Outloud: Shifts in Public Voice" Danah Boyd expresses the power of the
internet by comparing librarians and the Internet in terms of holding the power
in providing information to the public. Boyd also believes that “information is
power,” therefore the capabilities that the Internet has to provide information
favors and contributes to the power of democracy (par. 8). In Mathew Ingram’s article
he points out that social media, such as Twitter, can now break news in similar
ways traditional media outlets do. In another one of his works, Ingram refers
to news
as a process because it works its way through many media sources and
determines what is fact (par. 1). Twitter is a platform for an online public
sphere because news can be spread to and from citizens, without framing or inserted
ideologies to create a bias for the government. In, "Weblogs: a
history and perspective" Rebecca Blood expresses the ability of
weblogs, a form of citizen media, and their ability to transform citizens from
being an audience to a public and consumers to creators (par. 30). The public sphere is about creating and
sharing ideas as a public in a democracy and the Internet allows us to do so on
a worldwide scale.
No comments:
Post a Comment